S88-N has however the limitation, that it cannot be configured at all, i.e. And I feel very convinced, that I am going to make it work. And I would be forever bound to JMRI or RocRail, who both promises possibilities to configure LocoIO, or is it only a certain flavour thereof?Īfter a bit of pleasant communication with Litra.dk, I got him to make me some PCBs. It is probably only possible to set Uhlenbrocks own modules up from IB-COM. And I am also nervous that it is going to be difficult to set the module up (CV programming).
Rocrail review code#
But the source code is nowhere to be found. And everybody else are also protecting their software. Primo november 2014:Īfter many difficult considerations, I have come to the conclusion that the various flavors of LocoIO is a bit too closed and secret world. Note that something is mentioned under “software versions” about a change from 16F873 to 16F883. A study of the diagram must determine if the same HEX file can be used, i.e same PIC connected in the same way.
The original (that seems to be an improved version of the original original) at utilizes normal LocoNet connectors.
But I am not sure that I can find the CV definitions anywhere. But that programming may be possible through the RocRail program, which is free, and which I have already installed. And possibly, there will be some trouble with CV programming the module, since it is not known by the Uhlenbrock command station. Why not revert to that module and just make it with standard LocoNet connectors? OK, it is somewhat irritating not to be able to get the source code. And a part of that system is this simple 16 port LocoNet I/O module with HEX file for PIC. One of the very first considerations was if I should build my own command station. That requires a separate transformer >5V.īack to LocoNet. Maybe most important, the data bus is galvanic from the command station as well as from the track. And in addition, it is PICs, that interfaces the data bus, and not shift registers. S88N utilizes standard Ethernet (RJ45) cables and connectors. In addition, it is possible to buy PCBs and kits. And everything is PIC based and include both source code and HEX files. On there are many other very exiting projects. But the Danish page proposes some simplifications that would make this possible to build with simple means and spending little money. The better solution seems to be coming along.Īlright, the described solution with it’s SMD components is overly complicated implementation with many components and options. And I am not sure that I can find a diagram either, som maybe buying a kit or a finished board is the only possibility.Īfter a lot of research, I found S88N.
Rocrail review download#
However, it does no seem possible to download HEX file or source code. Of course, there are also other LocoNet possibilities.
And they now recommend placing all S88 modules right next to the command station. Not much more than 1 DKK per port.Īnd who says I cannot avoid noise problems, if I use proper shielded cables or just very short cables? Viessmann are now delivering S88 cables in lengths of only 15 cm with their S88 modules. Paco has a proposal, that looks easy and cheap. If I by that am able to generate a HEX file, I could buy an Atmel microcontroller and Reichelts best USB thing to push the HEX file into the microcontroller and see if that gives me a cheap LocoNet feedback module.Īs an alternative, I could explore the possibilities for DIY S88 modules. LocoBOD can be investigated without any cost by downloading the source code, installing WinAVR and see if it compiles. LocoBOD can offer a totally different and lower pricetag.
Rocrail review Pc#
Maybe even 2 or 3 ports per block, so that the PC can “see” the difference between the different parts of a block: Approach, Brake and Stop. And I need many ports, when I start building the real layout. They cost more than 1000 DKK for 16 ports. I’m in doubt: Uhlenbrock feedback modules cost 350 DKK for 16 ports.
0 kommentar(er)
